Welcome to the Grapevine

The Grapevine is administered by the UAF University Relations Department and was designed to dispel rumors, clarify misconceptions and clear up misunderstandings about UAF topics of a general nature to improve communication between the administration and the UAF community.

University Relations does our very best to get timely answers to your questions. Ideally, we try to post an answer within 48 hours of receiving the question. Occasionally, it can take up to several weeks to get an answer depending on the availability of the individuals who have the answers and the number of people who may be involved. If you feel your question has not been answered in a timely manner, please resubmit the original question or leave your name and contact information so we can update you on our progress.

Thank you for your suggestions.

Submit your question or suggestion here.

As always, building and facilities issues that need attention should be forwarded to dispatch@fs.uaf.edu or reported directly to 474-7000. Unsafe conditions should be reported to Environmental Health, Safety and Risk Management here.

 Subscribe to the Grapevine RSS feed (May require an RSS reader to display properly.)


Is the SRC going to get cable TV back? It was nice to be able to watch a sports event while working out.


Cable at the Student Recreation Center was provided through a contract Residence Life managed. Res Life cancelled the cable contract due to high cost and poor service. Cable is currently not provided on campus anywhere, not just the SRC. The university is exploring other cable providers, and we hope to have something by the new year.

— Mark Oldmixon, director, Department of Recreation, Adventure and Wellness; and director, Wood Center


The frozen/dead flowers all over campus look awful — when does the university plan to remove them?


First, thank you for being involved in the open and transparent discussion (Grapevine) for the betterment of our university.

The answer to your question is as follows:

Folks all over the Fairbanks campus love and have requested over the years for us to leave the plants in the ground right up until the first frost or snowfall, as they enjoy the colors and textures. Each year over the past six, the first frost day gets later and later. As we are on a hill, it sometimes is even later here on campus. It is always a balance of knowing when the first frost will occur and pulling the beds. This year as you know the first frost was just a couple days before the first snow, and with limited staffing, we do not have the ability to deal with the beds and traction issues at the same time. There is no snow forecast for the next week, and I’m sure the crews will be out clearing beds soon.

I hope that answers your question, and again, thank you for being an active part of making us better.

— Darrin “Bear” Edson, superintendent of operations, Facilities Services


Will UAF continue to use our Adobe Acrobat XI Pro license structure after Oct. 15, 2017? The splash screen states that support for the product ends Oct. 15, 2017. Will this also include our other Adobe products like PhotoShop? Will we have similar products to replace these now unsupported programs? With them being unsupported will this also mean they are soon to become security risks?


The university continues to evaluate software packages that are provided centrally to the whole UA system. Three years ago, Adobe changed its licensing model from one of concurrent use to an FTE model (i.e., based on the number of employees), which would have dramatically increased the cost to the university. At that time, the decision was made to stay with the existing Adobe Acrobat Pro program licenses for the foreseeable future.

The FREE Adobe Acrobat reader should always be kept current on your workstation — it can be downloaded from Adobe’s website. The university will continue to evaluate options and alternatives to Acrobat Pro.

The other Adobe Products, such as Photoshop and Illustrator, are no longer cost-effective for the university to license on an entire enterprise manner. The university continues to maintain CS6 in a shared concurrent manner. However,  individuals and departments needing more recent versions of those specific programs will need to purchase them on their own.

— Karl Kowalski, chief information technology officer, University of Alaska


I have a follow-up question to one asked some weeks ago. The previously asked question was the following: “If a student is removed from a class to protect her safety due to continued sexual harassment by the class instructor is the university required to make accommodations so the student can complete her course work?” Why would a class instructor who is repeatedly sexually harassing a student not be fired immediately? Why is UAF tolerating such behavior from faculty, staff or students?


When a complaint of sexual harassment is reported to the university, there is an obligation to review the complaint. The university will take immediate steps to stop the behavior, provide remedies and other support to the reporting party (complainant), conduct an unbiased investigation and take steps to prevent reoccurrence. For more detailed information about rights and resources provided complainants, please visit www.uaf.edu/titleix/.

Even if employees are accused of serious misconduct, they are generally entitled to a fair and impartial investigation into their conduct and due process under the Alaska and U.S. constitutions. If an employee were accused of the serious misconduct alleged below, he or she would likely be put on administrative leave or reassigned to a position with less risk to the university pending the outcome of an investigation. Based on the outcome of the investigation, the employee may be disciplined, up to and including termination. That allows the university to protect its community while also providing our employees with due process.

— Margo Griffith, Office of Diversity and Equal Opportunity director and Title IX coordinator
— Brad Lobland, Human Resources director

- 37.5-hour work week


Has UAF considered going to a 37.5-hour work week as a cost-saving measure?


UAF’s Planning and Budget Committee evaluated this option and found that it was not a solution that would work universitywide, as it generated no savings for employees funded through grants and contracts (and could in fact reduce  indirect cost recovery). It could also have disparate impacts for exempt and nonexempt employees, and could be untenable for offices with required service hours. Instead, individual departments have the ability to work with their employees and UAF HR to adjust contracts on a case-by-case basis.

— Briana Walters, senior business analyst, Office of Management and Budget


Will there be a tuition hike for the spring 2018 semester?


At its next meeting, Nov. 9-10, the UA Board of Regents will consider increasing student tuition by 5 percent in academic years 2019 and 2020, except at Kodiak College and Prince William Sound College. At those two community campuses tuition would increase by 10 percent in AY2019 and 9.5 percent in AY2020. The larger increase for KOC and PWSC will bring tuition into equilibrium with tuition rates assessed elsewhere by the university over the next two years.

For the past three academic years tuition has increased by 5 percent annually, which has helped offset declining general fund allocations from the state. Tuition and fees for a four-year program at UA are about 88 percent of the average cost for a 4-year program in the western United States. Between now and November, President Johnsen will be engaging students through listening sessions and soliciting feedback on the proposed tuition increases.

A student tuition forum will be held on the Fairbanks campus Wednesday, Oct. 18, from 5-6:30 in the Wood Center multilevel lounge.

— Monique Musick, public information coordinator, University of Alaska


Which level of findings of fact will the UAF Title IX office apply in Title IX cases? The findings of fact and conclusions should be reached by applying either a preponderance of the evidence standard or a clear and convincing evidence standard.

See Question 8.



For decades, the University of Alaska has used the preponderance of the evidence standard to decide employee and student discipline matters. “The preponderance” means that it is more likely than not that alleged conduct occurred. In 2011, when the Department of Education mandated that all schools use the preponderance standard in Title IX matters, that mandate did not change how we decided responsibility. While the Department of Education’s September 2017 Dear Colleague Letter and Q&A allows for some flexibility regarding which standard of proof schools use, UAF continues to follow our historical practice and UA Board of Regents Policy 01.04.090(A)(8), which establishes that the preponderance standard will be used in Title IX investigations, as it is with other employee and student discipline matters.

— Margo Griffith, director, Office of Diversity and Equal Opportunity, and UAF Title IX coordinator


What is the plan for assessing the success of the Strategic Pathways process? Is it posted somewhere?


Strategic Pathways is designed to guide our system for the next few years. Some 230 people took a critical look at 22 key areas, including finance, engineering, teacher education and procurement.

The work resulting from the phase 1, 2 and 3 team options may not produce immediate results. The long-term goals of the process are to focus on cost-effectiveness, quality, access, community impact and fiscal sustainability, the success of which may take years to be fully realized.

Although we are still in implementation mode, here are some improvements to date:

a.      We are reducing management schools from three to two.
b.      We are reducing three education schools to one.
c.      We are reducing three procurement centers to one.
d.      We are reducing three academic calendars to one.
e.      We have established a common set of general education requirements, making it easier for our students to transfer across the system.

Other areas of review are going through a needs assessment for further fact finding before going into the implementation phase. We are training our people in Lean Process Improvement, and streamlining and automating clunky administrative processes and systems.

As we continue to progress with implementation plans, information will be shared via the UA Board of Regents’ meeting agendas and materials and the Strategic Pathways website.

— Roberta Graham, associate vice president, UA Office of Public Affairs


For five years, the Anvik Trail between the Taku and Ballaine parking lots and the intersection of Tanana Loop and North Tanana Drive has been used by vehicles. I’ve seen Facilities Services, UAF police, contractors and the occasional private vehicle drive up and sometimes down the hill. Most recently, the UAF shuttle has begun using trail to service the route between the Taku hut and the rest of campus. Over the last month, the trail surface has deformed and ruts have developed in several sections.

Except where there is an actual need, I think motorized vehicles should exit Taku and Ballaine via Farmers Loop and re-enter campus via North Tanana Drive or Alumni Drive. If there is a problem with that intersection, then we should be addressing those issues with either the DOT or the FNSB as appropriate. Using a trail as a shortcut for vehicles is not a long-term solution and I would like to see UAF take steps to restore the Anvik Trail to non-motorized use only.


Thank you for your submission. At this time the section of the Anvik Trail you are referring to is posted for “Authorized Vehicle Use Only.” The trail will be improved once things dry out next spring. During spring breakup the shuttle bus will use Alumni Drive.

— Darrin Edson, superintendent of operations, Facilities Services

Posts navigation